Best ETFs for a Balanced Portfolio
A balanced portfolio captures most of the market's upside with half the stomach ache. Here is how to build one.
Don't have time? Here's what you need to know:
- 1A 60/40 portfolio captures ~80% of stock market returns with ~50-60% of the drawdowns
- 2VTI (40%) + VXUS (20%) + BND (30%) + BSV (10%) is a complete balanced portfolio for $4 per $10K per year
- 3The real value of balance: investors who hold through crashes build more wealth than those who panic-sell aggressive portfolios
- 4Target-date funds are balanced portfolios on autopilot — a legitimate alternative to DIY
What a Balanced Portfolio Actually Means
A balanced portfolio splits between stocks (growth) and bonds (stability), typically 50/50 to 70/30. The classic 60/40 portfolio (60% stocks, 40% bonds) has been the default recommendation from financial advisors for decades. It captures about 80% of the stock market's long-term returns while experiencing roughly 50-60% of the drawdowns.
Balanced investing is not about maximizing returns — it is about maximizing risk-adjusted returns. The investor who earns 7% per year for 30 years without selling during a crash builds more wealth than the investor who earns 10% per year but panic-sells during the two inevitable 30% drops.
Best ETFs for a Balanced Portfolio
This four-fund balanced portfolio costs about $4 per $10,000 per year. Alternative: use a target-date fund (like Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 at 0.08%) for automatic rebalancing. Target-date funds are balanced portfolios on autopilot.
| Role | ETF | Allocation (60/40) | Expense Ratio | What It Provides |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Stocks | VTI | 40% | 0.03% | Growth engine |
| International Stocks | VXUS | 20% | 0.07% | Geographic diversification |
| U.S. Bonds | BND | 30% | 0.03% | Income and crash protection |
| Short-Term Bonds | BSV | 10% | 0.04% | Stability buffer, lower rate risk |
What to Expect From a Balanced Portfolio
A 60/40 portfolio has returned about 8% per year historically (vs 10% for 100% stocks). During the 2008 crisis, it fell about 22% (vs 37% for stocks). During 2022, it fell about 16% (vs 19% for stocks — a smaller gap because both stocks and bonds declined). The portfolio's defensive value shows most in sharp equity-led crashes.
The psychological benefit matters as much as the financial benefit. An investor who holds a 60/40 portfolio through a 22% drop is less likely to panic-sell than one holding 100% stocks watching a 37% drop. If the balanced portfolio keeps you invested, it will outperform the aggressive portfolio you would have sold at the bottom.
Tip: Rebalance your balanced portfolio annually. If stocks outperform and push your allocation to 70/30, sell some stocks and buy bonds to return to 60/40. This forces you to sell high and buy low — the opposite of what most investors do instinctively.
Ready to invest? Open an IBKR account in 10 minutes and get free stock. $0 commissions on US ETFs • Fractional shares from $1 • 150+ global markets.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 60/40 still a good strategy?
Yes, with a caveat. The 60/40 portfolio had a rough 2022 because stocks and bonds fell simultaneously (unusual). But over 30+ year periods, 60/40 has consistently delivered solid risk-adjusted returns. One bad year does not invalidate decades of evidence.
Should younger investors use a balanced portfolio?
If you can truly hold through a 40% crash without selling, 80/20 or 90/10 is better for your age. If you know you would panic, 60/40 or 70/30 produces better real-world results because you actually stick with it. Honest self-assessment matters more than theoretical optimization.
Can I use a target-date fund instead of building my own balanced portfolio?
Absolutely. Target-date funds hold stocks and bonds at appropriate ratios for your age, rebalance automatically, and shift more conservative over time. Vanguard's cost 0.08%. It is a perfectly valid one-fund balanced portfolio that requires zero management.
Further Reading
Free Tools
Alex Harrington
CFA Level II Candidate, Finance & Economics
Alex Harrington is an independent ETF researcher and personal finance writer with over 8 years of experience analyzing exchange-traded funds. A CFA Level II candidate with a background in economics, Alex has reviewed 800+ ETFs and helped thousands of beginners build their first investment portfolios through clear, jargon-free education.
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.