QQQ vs SMH: Head-to-Head Comparison
QQQ vs SMH: Invesco QQQ Trust has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VanEck Semiconductor ETF charges 0.35%. QQQ holds 101 securities vs SMH's 25. 5-year returns: 19.50% vs 29.80%.
Last updated: April 2026
Nasdaq vs Semiconductor
Quick Verdict
QQQ edges out SMH with a stronger Beginner Suitability Score (8.5 vs 7). It offers lower fees for new investors.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| AUM | $310.0B | $20.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 101 | 25 |
| 1-Year Return | 29.80% | 41.50% |
| 5-Year Return (Ann.) | 19.50% | 29.80% |
| 10-Year Return (Ann.) | 18.50% | 25.80% |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.38 |
| P/E Ratio | 33.2 | 32.0 |
QQQ 5-year annualized return is 19.50% compared to SMH's 29.80%. Over 10 years, QQQ returned 18.50% vs SMH's 25.80%.
View data table
| Period | QQQ Return | SMH Return |
|---|---|---|
| YTD | 3.50% | 4.50% |
| 1 Year | 29.80% | 41.50% |
| 3 Year | 13.20% | 21.50% |
| 5 Year | 19.50% | 29.80% |
| 10 Year | 18.50% | 25.80% |
Key Differences Between QQQ and SMH
QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) is a u.s. large-cap growth fund managed by Invesco. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. It is heavily tilted toward technology and growth stocks, making it a favorite for investors who want concentrated exposure to the tech sector. Beginners should understand that QQQ can deliver higher returns than the S&P 500 in good years but also experiences sharper declines during downturns.
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is a semiconductors fund managed by VanEck. SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, holding the 25 largest and most liquid semiconductor companies. Unlike SOXX, SMH is market-cap-weighted, which gives more influence to the biggest chipmakers like NVIDIA and TSMC. Beginners choosing between SMH and SOXX should know that SMH is more concentrated in mega-cap chip stocks, which has driven its stronger performance during the AI boom.
The most notable differences are in fees (0.20% vs 0.35%), number of holdings (101 vs 25), and 5-year returns (19.50% vs 29.80%).
QQQ vs SMH multi-factor comparison: QQQ has a 0.20% expense ratio, 19.50% 5-year return, 101 holdings, 1.15 beta, and 0.60% yield. SMH has 0.35% expense ratio, 29.80% 5-year return, 25 holdings, 1.38 beta, and 0.50% yield.
View data table
| Metric | QQQ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| 5-Year Return | 19.50% | 29.80% |
| Holdings | 101 | 25 |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.38 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.50% |
Want the full framework? This 2-hour ETF course teaches you exactly how to pick, buy, and hold profitable ETFs — from zero to confident investor. Under $15.
Ready to invest? Open an IBKR account in 10 minutes and get free stock. $0 commissions on US ETFs • Fractional shares from $1 • 150+ global markets.
Holdings Overlap Analysis
11%
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SMH share only 11% of their top holdings. These funds are quite different, making them complementary choices if you want broader market coverage.
QQQ and SMH share 11% of their top holdings (low overlap). QQQ has 101 total holdings and SMH has 25. Common holdings include NVDA, AVGO.
View data table
| Metric | QQQ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Overlap | 11% | 11% |
| Unique Holdings | 89% | 89% |
| Total Holdings | 101 | 25 |
Cost Comparison Over Time
If you invest $10,000 and hold for 20 years (assuming 8% annual returns):
QQQ
Fee cost: $1,696
SMH
Fee cost: $2,930
Over 20 years, the fee difference amounts to $1,234 on a $10,000 investment. QQQ saves you more in fees over time.
On a $10,000 investment over 20 years at 8% return, QQQ (0.20% fee) grows to $44,913 while SMH (0.35% fee) grows to $43,680. The fee difference costs $1,233.
View data table
| Year | QQQ Value | SMH Value |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 5 | $14,558 | $14,457 |
| 10 | $21,193 | $20,900 |
| 15 | $30,852 | $30,214 |
| 20 | $44,913 | $43,680 |
Which One Should a Beginner Choose?
Choose QQQ if: You want growth-oriented investors with a long time horizon and higher risk tolerance, investors who want concentrated exposure to technology and innovation leaders, younger investors who can tolerate short-term volatility for potentially higher long-term returns. It's managed by Invesco with an expense ratio of 0.20%.
Choose SMH if: You want investors who want maximum exposure to the biggest winners in the semiconductor space, those who prefer a cap-weighted approach that includes global chip leaders like tsmc and asml, growth investors willing to accept extreme concentration for potentially higher returns. It's managed by VanEck with an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Can You Own Both QQQ and SMH?
Absolutely! With only 11% overlap, QQQ and SMH complement each other well. A simple portfolio might allocate 60% to one and 40% to the other, or you could pair them with a bond ETF like BND for a complete three-fund portfolio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I buy QQQ or SMH?▾
QQQ edges out SMH with a stronger Beginner Suitability Score (8.5 vs 7). It offers lower fees for new investors. However, both are solid options. QQQ is best for investors who want growth-oriented investors with a long time horizon and higher risk tolerance, while SMH is better suited for investors who want maximum exposure to the biggest winners in the semiconductor space.
What is the difference between QQQ and SMH?▾
QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks u.s. large-cap growth investments with 101 holdings and a 0.20% expense ratio. SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) focuses on semiconductors with 25 holdings at 0.35%. Their top holdings overlap by 11%.
Can I own both QQQ and SMH?▾
Yes! With only 11% holdings overlap, QQQ and SMH complement each other well. Owning both gives you broader diversification.