Best Robotics and Automation ETFs
Robotics ETFs invest in the companies automating factories, warehouses, and surgery. Here is what they hold and whether the returns justify the fees.
Don't have time? Here's what you need to know:
- 1BOTZ is the most popular robotics ETF (45 stocks, 0.68%) blending AI and industrial automation
- 2Robotics ETFs overlap heavily with tech ETFs — check holdings before paying the thematic premium
- 3VGT or QQQ provide most of the same exposure at 0.04-0.20% vs 0.68-0.95% for thematic funds
- 4The unique value of robotics ETFs is industrial automation companies (Fanuc, Keyence, ABB) not in standard tech funds
Robotics: The Slow-Burn Automation Trend
Unlike AI hype that surges overnight, robotics and automation is a steady multi-decade trend. Industrial robots in factories, surgical robots in hospitals (Intuitive Surgical's da Vinci system), warehouse automation (Amazon's logistics robots), and autonomous driving — these are slowly transforming industries. The global robotics market is projected to reach $250+ billion by 2030.
Robotics ETFs blend AI companies (Nvidia powers robotic systems), industrial automation (Fanuc, ABB, Keyence), and specialized robotics firms. The overlap with broader AI and tech ETFs is significant — Nvidia appears in almost every robotics fund.
Best Robotics and Automation ETFs Compared
BOTZ is the most popular choice with a balance of AI and industrial robotics companies. ROBO is broader but charges nearly 1% — expensive for a passive thematic ETF. IRBO is the cheapest but very broadly defined. ARKQ is actively managed by Ark Invest and carries the risk of concentrated stock picks.
| ETF | Focus | Expense Ratio | Holdings | Top Positions | 5-Year Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | Global robotics + AI | 0.68% | 45 | Nvidia, Intuitive Surgical, Keyence | ~12% |
| ROBO | Robotics + automation | 0.95% | 80 | Diversified across industrial + tech | ~8% |
| ARKQ | Autonomous tech (active) | 0.75% | 35 | Tesla, Kratos, Iridium | ~5% |
| IRBO | Robotics + AI (iShares) | 0.47% | 100+ | Equal-weighted, very broad | ~7% |
Robotics ETFs vs Broader Tech Exposure
BOTZ charges 0.68% for 45 stocks. VGT charges 0.04% for 320+ tech stocks that include most BOTZ holdings. QQQ charges 0.20% for 100 stocks including Nvidia and other robotics-adjacent companies. The thematic label costs you 3-17x more in fees for a portfolio that significantly overlaps with cheaper alternatives.
The justification for paying the premium: robotics ETFs include industrial automation companies (Fanuc, ABB, Keyence) that are not in tech ETFs. If you specifically want Japanese and European industrial robotics exposure, BOTZ provides it. If your interest is primarily AI and autonomous tech, QQQ or VUG covers most of the same ground at a fraction of the cost.
Tip: Before buying a thematic ETF, check its top 10 holdings against what you already own. If 7 out of 10 are in your VTI or QQQ, the thematic fund is mostly redundant.
Want the full framework? This 2-hour ETF course teaches you exactly how to pick, buy, and hold profitable ETFs — from zero to confident investor. Under $15.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BOTZ worth the 0.68% expense ratio?
Only if you specifically want industrial robotics companies (Fanuc, Keyence, ABB) that are not in standard tech ETFs. If your interest is mainly AI and Nvidia, VUG (0.04%) or QQQ (0.20%) give you similar exposure at a fraction of the cost.
Will robotics ETFs outperform the S&P 500?
Unknown. Robotics is growing as an industry, but ETF returns depend on stock valuations, not just industry growth. Many robotics stocks already trade at premium P/E ratios. Historically, thematic ETFs as a category have underperformed broad index funds due to high fees and hype-driven buying at peak valuations.
BOTZ or ROBO — which is better?
BOTZ has lower fees (0.68% vs 0.95%) and better 5-year returns. ROBO is more diversified (80 vs 45 holdings) but the higher fee and broader definition have diluted performance. BOTZ is the better choice for most investors.
Further Reading
Free Tools
Alex Harrington
CFA Level II Candidate, Finance & Economics
Alex Harrington is an independent ETF researcher and personal finance writer with over 8 years of experience analyzing exchange-traded funds. A CFA Level II candidate with a background in economics, Alex has reviewed 800+ ETFs and helped thousands of beginners build their first investment portfolios through clear, jargon-free education.
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.