SCHD vs VIG: Best Dividend Growth ETF?
SCHD chases quality plus a higher yield; VIG prioritizes a long track record of rising dividends over current income. Same low fee, very different portfolios. Here's how to choose.
Don't have time? Here's what you need to know:
- 1SCHD screens for quality plus higher yield (~3.5%); VIG screens for 10+ years of rising dividends at a lower yield (~1.7%–2%).
- 2SCHD holds ~100 value-leaning names; VIG holds 300+ with a more growth-tilted sector mix.
- 3Both cost 0.06%, so the choice is about yield-today versus dividend-growth, not fees.
- 4Their overlap is only moderate, so some investors hold both to blend income and growth.
Two Philosophies of Dividend Investing
Both SCHD and VIG are dividend-focused ETFs, but they screen for different things. SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity) tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which starts from companies with 10+ years of payouts and then ranks them on fundamental quality — cash flow to debt, return on equity, dividend yield, and dividend growth — keeping roughly 100 names. The result skews toward higher current yield and value-leaning sectors.
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation) tracks an index of U.S. companies with at least 10 consecutive years of increasing dividends, then screens out the highest yielders. The logic is that a long, unbroken streak of dividend hikes signals durable, growing businesses. VIG therefore holds more names (around 300+), leans toward higher-quality large caps, and deliberately accepts a lower current yield in exchange for dividend-growth consistency.
Yield Today vs Growth Tomorrow
The most practical difference is yield. SCHD typically yields meaningfully more — often around 3.5% — because its methodology actively rewards higher payouts. VIG typically yields less, frequently in the 1.7%–2% range, because it screens the highest yielders out and prioritizes the growth track record instead. If you want more income in hand today, SCHD usually delivers it.
VIG's pitch is the trajectory rather than the level. By holding companies with long histories of raising dividends, it aims for a payout that grows steadily over time and a portfolio of stable, profitable businesses. That growth tilt also tends to give VIG a slightly different sector mix — more weight in areas like technology and industrials — versus SCHD's heavier lean toward consumer staples, energy, and other classic value sectors.
| SCHD | VIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| Index | Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers |
| Selection | Quality + higher yield | 10+ yrs rising dividends |
| Holdings | ~100 | ~300+ |
| Typical yield | ~3.5% | ~1.7%–2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Cost and Overlap
On cost the two are essentially tied: SCHD charges 0.06% and VIG charges 0.06%, both far below the average dividend mutual fund. The expense ratio won't be the deciding factor here.
Overlap is moderate but not high. Both are large-cap dividend funds, so they share some blue-chip names, but their different screens — high yield plus quality for SCHD, dividend-growth streak for VIG — push them toward different stocks and sector weights. That makes them complementary rather than redundant. Some income investors hold both to get SCHD's yield alongside VIG's growth consistency.
Tip: Holding SCHD and VIG together is one way to blend a higher current yield with a longer dividend-growth track record, since their stock and sector overlap is only moderate.
Want the full framework? This 2-hour ETF course teaches you exactly how to pick, buy, and hold profitable ETFs — from zero to confident investor. Under $15.
Which to Choose
Lean SCHD if your priority is income now and you like its quality screen — it suits investors closer to or in retirement who want a higher yield without reaching into risky high-yield territory. Lean VIG if you're earlier in your investing life and care more about owning durable dividend-growers whose payouts compound upward, accepting a lower starting yield for that consistency.
Neither is a substitute for a total-market core. Both tilt toward established large caps and underweight or exclude the high-growth, low-or-no-dividend companies that have driven much of the market's recent returns. Many investors hold one of these alongside a broad fund like VTI rather than in place of it.
Important: Dividend ETFs aren't lower-risk versions of the whole market. By tilting to dividend payers they underweight non-paying growth names, so they can lag a broad index for long stretches when growth leads.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SCHD or VIG better for dividend income?
For current income, SCHD usually wins — it typically yields around 3.5% versus VIG's roughly 1.7%–2%, because SCHD's methodology rewards higher payouts while VIG screens the highest yielders out. VIG is built for dividend growth and consistency rather than yield, so it suits investors who care more about a rising payout over time than income today.
What's the real difference in how SCHD and VIG pick stocks?
SCHD starts with companies that have paid dividends for 10+ years, then ranks them on quality metrics like cash-flow-to-debt and return on equity, keeping about 100. VIG requires at least 10 consecutive years of dividend increases and removes the highest yielders, holding 300+ names. SCHD optimizes for quality plus yield; VIG optimizes for a long streak of dividend growth.
Can I hold both SCHD and VIG?
Yes, and many investors do. Their overlap is only moderate because their screens push them toward different stocks and sectors. Holding both blends SCHD's higher yield and value tilt with VIG's dividend-growth consistency and slightly more growth-oriented sector mix.
Do SCHD and VIG cost the same?
Effectively yes. SCHD charges a 0.06% expense ratio and VIG charges 0.06%, both well below typical actively managed dividend funds. Cost won't be the deciding factor between them — the choice comes down to yield versus dividend-growth focus.
Further Reading
Free Tools
Alex Harrington
CFA Level II Candidate, Finance & Economics
Alex Harrington is an independent ETF researcher and personal finance writer with over 8 years of experience analyzing exchange-traded funds. A CFA Level II candidate with a background in economics, Alex has reviewed 800+ ETFs and helped thousands of beginners build their first investment portfolios through clear, jargon-free education.
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.