KWEB vs MCHI: Head-to-Head Comparison
KWEB vs MCHI: KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an expense ratio of 0.69% while iShares MSCI China ETF charges 0.59%. KWEB holds 55 securities vs MCHI's 600. 5-year returns: -3.00% vs -2.00%.
Last updated: April 2026
China
Quick Verdict
MCHI edges out KWEB with a stronger Beginner Suitability Score (9.5 vs 8). It offers lower fees for new investors.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KWEB | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $5.0B | $5.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.80% |
| Holdings | 55 | 600 |
| 1-Year Return | 10.00% | 8.00% |
| 5-Year Return (Ann.) | -3.00% | -2.00% |
| 10-Year Return (Ann.) | 2.00% | 3.00% |
| Beta | 1.05 | 0.90 |
| P/E Ratio | 20.0 | 12.5 |
KWEB 5-year annualized return is -3.00% compared to MCHI's -2.00%. Over 10 years, KWEB returned 2.00% vs MCHI's 3.00%.
View data table
| Period | KWEB Return | MCHI Return |
|---|---|---|
| YTD | 4.00% | 3.00% |
| 1 Year | 10.00% | 8.00% |
| 3 Year | -8.00% | -6.00% |
| 5 Year | -3.00% | -2.00% |
| 10 Year | 2.00% | 3.00% |
Key Differences Between KWEB and MCHI
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) is a china internet fund managed by KraneShares. KWEB invests in Chinese companies that derive most of their revenue from internet and e-commerce activities, including search engines, social media, and online retail. It provides targeted access to China's massive digital economy without buying individual Chinese stocks. This fund is the most popular way for US investors to participate in the growth of China's technology sector.
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) is a china equity fund managed by BlackRock. MCHI provides broad exposure to Chinese stocks across all sectors, including technology, financials, consumer goods, and healthcare. It tracks the MSCI China Index which covers large- and mid-cap companies listed in Hong Kong, mainland China, and the US. This fund is the most detailed single-fund option for investors wanting diversified Chinese equity exposure.
The most notable differences are in fees (0.69% vs 0.59%), number of holdings (55 vs 600), and 5-year returns (-3.00% vs -2.00%).
KWEB vs MCHI multi-factor comparison: KWEB has a 0.69% expense ratio, -3.00% 5-year return, 55 holdings, 1.05 beta, and 0.50% yield. MCHI has 0.59% expense ratio, -2.00% 5-year return, 600 holdings, 0.90 beta, and 1.80% yield.
View data table
| Metric | KWEB | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.59% |
| 5-Year Return | -3.00% | -2.00% |
| Holdings | 55 | 600 |
| Beta | 1.05 | 0.90 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.80% |
Want the full framework? This 2-hour ETF course teaches you exactly how to pick, buy, and hold profitable ETFs — from zero to confident investor. Under $15.
Ready to invest? Open an IBKR account in 10 minutes and get free stock. $0 commissions on US ETFs • Fractional shares from $1 • 150+ global markets.
Holdings Overlap Analysis
43%
Holdings Overlap
KWEB and MCHI share 43% of their top holdings. There is moderate overlap, so owning both provides some additional diversification but with diminishing returns.
KWEB and MCHI share 43% of their top holdings (moderate overlap). KWEB has 55 total holdings and MCHI has 600. Common holdings include 0700.HK, BABA, PDD.
View data table
| Metric | KWEB | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Overlap | 43% | 43% |
| Unique Holdings | 57% | 57% |
| Total Holdings | 55 | 600 |
Cost Comparison Over Time
If you invest $10,000 and hold for 20 years (assuming 8% annual returns):
KWEB
Fee cost: $5,608
MCHI
Fee cost: $4,837
Over 20 years, the fee difference amounts to $771 on a $10,000 investment. MCHI saves you more in fees over time.
On a $10,000 investment over 20 years at 8% return, KWEB (0.69% fee) grows to $41,002 while MCHI (0.59% fee) grows to $41,773. The fee difference costs $771.
View data table
| Year | KWEB Value | MCHI Value |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $10,000 | $10,000 |
| 5 | $14,230 | $14,296 |
| 10 | $20,249 | $20,438 |
| 15 | $28,814 | $29,219 |
| 20 | $41,002 | $41,773 |
Which One Should a Beginner Choose?
Choose KWEB if: You want investors with high conviction in china's long-term digital economy growth, those seeking value-oriented tech exposure at lower multiples than us tech, international diversifiers who want concentrated access to chinese internet leaders. It's managed by KraneShares with an expense ratio of 0.69%.
Choose MCHI if: You want investors wanting diversified single-country chinese equity exposure across all sectors, those who prefer broad market coverage over concentrated internet or tech bets, portfolio builders looking for a detailed china allocation in their international sleeve. It's managed by BlackRock with an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Can You Own Both KWEB and MCHI?
Absolutely! With only 43% overlap, KWEB and MCHI complement each other well. A simple portfolio might allocate 60% to one and 40% to the other, or you could pair them with a bond ETF like BND for a complete three-fund portfolio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I buy KWEB or MCHI?▾
MCHI edges out KWEB with a stronger Beginner Suitability Score (9.5 vs 8). It offers lower fees for new investors. However, both are solid options. KWEB is best for investors who want investors with high conviction in china's long-term digital economy growth, while MCHI is better suited for investors wanting diversified single-country chinese equity exposure across all sectors.
What is the difference between KWEB and MCHI?▾
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) tracks china internet investments with 55 holdings and a 0.69% expense ratio. MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) focuses on china equity with 600 holdings at 0.59%. Their top holdings overlap by 43%.
Can I own both KWEB and MCHI?▾
Yes! With only 43% holdings overlap, KWEB and MCHI complement each other well. Owning both gives you broader diversification.